I think the bit you've seen is "CPC module 2" which is based on the original theory test but takes a single senario and asks a few questions about that. If you didn't see a message, you most likely just clicked slightly too early for those 0 scores.ĬPC is a little confusing especially when you look at the DVSA web site. The click fraud thing seems to be looking for rapid clicking over and over, and from what I've been told at least it will tell you that you've been zero'd for that question after the hazard video is over. It doesn't seem to trigger the click fraud system according to what I've read, and it worked for me going by some of the scores I got. Mind you, this was devised by the DVSA so we can't expect too much.Īs for how to get around it - I read an awful lot on this and the general opinion seemed to be do the first click when you think the hazard appears, then a second click a second later like you did in the practice. Hazard perception is the nasty and stupidly designed one as it it fixed on a 5 second period, but can't understand that you might actually genuinely spot a hazard slightly early. Thank you for any answers Differential SENIOR MEMBER Posts: 32 Joined: Wed 12:09 pm Sorry for the absolute essay of a question, If I booked the test CPC one for the same day, could I pass knowing what I already know from the multiple choice? Or shall I wait and learn the necessary information? I just realised, though, that part of the driver CPC is sat in the test centre too, so would I be better off changing it so I can do them both the same day? I haven't even looked into the CPC properly, I know one is test and one is not. Has anyone ever experienced this while practicing on them or doing the test? Any thoughts on this would helpĪnyway, I've had to rebook my hazard perception test, the next one I can do is a week on Thursday at 6:45pm. But in the test today I felt a bit paranoid about voiding so I didn't really want to press too much (apparently their software can pick up patterned clicking and void your clip score, and I thought maybe my double clicking may have been picked up by this, so I single clicked the test). In the app I managed to pretty much get around this by pressing, then pressing again a second or so later, making sure I was in the scoring range. I think this is what's happened on the test today, it's because the CGI ones are as if they are slowed down so it makes it easier because the hazards are happening much slower. On the video camera ones I generally get good passable scores, but on the CGI ones I often got 0 because I was spotting the hazard and pressing before it was a hazard, so too early. I've been practicing on an app and on a PC program, they use a mixture of the videos recorded (with a camera) and some of the official CGI clips. It's like it's slow motion or something so it's very easy to see the hazards. When I did my car theory it was video footage, filmed with an actual camera, for the hazard perception, but it's obviously changed now and it's all CGI. On the scoring sheet, most were a mixture between 5 points per clip, or 0. Which I found weird because I seen every single hazard and pressed in very good time. I passed multiple choice quite easily but I failed on my hazard perception. Having passed my car ones 2 years ago easily and practising loads for this one, I went in there feeling quite confident. Today I sat my theory, it was my multiple choice and hazard perception test.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |